© 2026 Radiology Jobs, LLC. All Rights Reserved. • Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
CT vacancy rates hit an all-time high of 19.4%. Here's what's driving the allied health imaging staffing crisis — and what employers can do differently.
If you run an imaging department, you already know something is wrong. Positions stay open longer than they should. Your remaining staff absorbs the volume. You post jobs and wait. Eventually, you either settle, overpay a travel staffing agency, or go without.
What you may not fully appreciate yet is how structural this problem has become — and why the usual hiring playbook is making it worse.
According to the American Society of Radiologic Technologists' 2025 Radiologic Sciences Staffing and Workplace Survey, CT vacancy rates have hit an all-time high of 19.4% — the worst figure recorded in the survey's 22-year history. MRI vacancies stand at 17.4%, up from 16.2% just two years ago. The 2024 ASRT Radiation Therapy Staffing and Workplace Survey put radiation therapy vacancies at 13.6%, roughly four times the 2018 rate. Every imaging modality tracked by ASRT remains above its 2020 pandemic-era levels.
These are not blips. They are the baseline.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects approximately 15,400 annual job openings for radiologic and MRI technologists through 2034 — and the majority of those openings exist not because the field is growing rapidly, but because facilities are losing staff they cannot replace. Retirements, career exits, and lateral moves to travel staffing are the primary drivers. The field grows at roughly 5% over ten years. The replacement demand is relentless.
Meanwhile, the pipeline is tightening, not expanding. ASRT's 2025 enrollment data shows radiography program enrollment declined from 19,815 to 19,547 students year over year. Radiation therapy enrollment dropped more sharply — from 1,663 to 1,397. ASRT has flagged faculty shortages as a constraint on program expansion. Accreditation requirements and clinical site limitations compound the problem. Fewer qualified candidates are entering the workforce each year than the market needs, and there is no short-term mechanism to change that math.
Understanding what's actually driving this crisis matters, because surface-level responses to deep structural problems don't hold. The forces at work here are external to any single organization — which means no amount of internal initiative fully insulates you from them. What you can control is how intelligently you respond.
The pipeline is contracting at the exact moment demand is rising. Training program enrollment isn't keeping pace with workforce exit. ASRT has flagged faculty shortages and accreditation constraints as barriers to expanding program capacity, meaning the number of credentialed technologists entering the field each year is structurally limited. You are competing for a shrinking pool of new graduates while simultaneously trying to retain experienced staff that other facilities are actively recruiting away from you.
Travel staffing permanently reset compensation expectations. When facilities turned to travel techs during the pandemic to fill critical gaps, they established a new market rate that the permanent employment market has been chasing ever since. Travel rad techs today routinely earn $2,000 to $3,500 or more per week — annualizing to $100,000 to $170,000 or beyond including stipends. The average R.T. salary has responded: ASRT's 2024 Wage and Salary Survey puts it at $86,484, a 12.3% increase from 2022. The gap between permanent and travel compensation has narrowed, but experienced technologists who discovered the travel premium during COVID have a reference point that shapes every compensation conversation they have with a permanent employer.
Incentive escalation has become expected, not differentiating. A 2022 AMN Healthcare survey of over 1,000 healthcare facilities found that 67% were offering signing bonuses and other hiring incentives for allied health roles, and that 85% of facilities reported active shortages. Signing bonuses are no longer a signal that your organization is especially competitive. They're table stakes — and candidates evaluating two offers with comparable bonuses are making their decision based on everything else in the package.
Most imaging employers are still hiring the way they hired a decade ago, when vacancy rates were manageable and a posting on a general healthcare job board could generate enough volume that someone useful eventually appeared. That logic assumed a surplus of candidates actively searching. The current market has neither the surplus nor the active searchers.
Generic job platforms weren't designed for imaging. They don't distinguish between a CT tech with ten years of cardiac CT experience and someone who completed their clinical rotation last year. They aggregate broadly, which generates noise — resumes that don't match, candidates who don't hold the right credentials, volume without signal. Time spent reviewing unqualified submissions is time that imaging leaders don't have.
Staffing agencies can move fast in a pinch, but they solve a cash-flow problem, not a hiring problem. A typical agency placement costs 20–35% of the candidate's first-year salary. More importantly, it doesn't build your pipeline. Every agency relationship is a transaction. The moment it ends, you're back to the beginning, often having spent enough on temporary coverage to have funded a meaningful retention investment instead.
The employers navigating this shortage most effectively share a few consistent habits. None of them are complicated. What they require is a willingness to treat hiring as a strategic function rather than a reactive one.
Lead with total compensation — and make it visible. Today's technologists are evaluating the full picture: schedule stability, weekend rotation, call requirements, PTO structure, continuing education support, and retirement matching alongside base pay. A posting that buries these details — or omits them entirely — loses candidates before the conversation starts. Publish your pay range. Be specific about what the schedule actually looks like. If the role has no on-call, say so. That one line may be the detail that turns a passive browser into an active applicant.
Specificity is a competitive advantage. A posting for "MRI Technologist — Full Time" tells a candidate almost nothing. A posting for "MRI Technologist — 3T experience preferred, Monday through Friday days, academic medical center environment, pay range $82K–$94K" tells them whether the role is worth their time. Specificity attracts the right candidates and filters out the rest, which improves your return on every hour spent reviewing submissions.
Reach candidates where they actually are. Most qualified allied health professionals are employed when you need them. They're not refreshing job boards during their lunch break. If your recruiting strategy depends entirely on candidates actively searching, you are structurally limited to a fraction of the available talent pool — and often the least experienced fraction at that. Presence on platforms and in communities where imaging professionals engage professionally, even when they're not actively looking, is how you get in front of the people you actually want to hire.
Treat retention as a recruiting tool. Every technologist you retain is a search you don't have to fund, a coverage gap you don't have to fill, and an experienced team member who doesn't carry institutional knowledge out the door when they leave. Exit interviews, proactive compensation benchmarking, and scheduling conversations before someone reaches the breaking point are worth more than most organizations realize. The facilities with the healthiest staffing situations today invested in retention three years ago, before the crisis made it urgent.
Build your pipeline before the vacancy opens. The employers managing this market most effectively are not starting from zero when a technologist resigns. They maintain active job postings, keep their employer profiles current, and stay in front of qualified candidates even when their roster is technically full. When someone does leave — and eventually someone will — they are already visible to the candidates who might fill that role.
Everything above assumes one thing: that your job posting can actually reach the right candidates. And that's where the platform matters as much as the strategy.
Here's the uncomfortable truth about how allied health imaging jobs get posted today. The dominant channels — general healthcare job boards, broad staffing aggregators, agency pipelines — were built for volume, not precision. They don't differentiate between a CT tech with a decade of cardiac experience and a new graduate who completed one clinical rotation. They don't let candidates search by modality, subspecialty, or shift preference. And they treat imaging professionals as a subcategory of healthcare labor rather than a distinct professional community with specific credentials, workflows, and career priorities.
The result is predictable: employers get noise, candidates get irrelevant results, and everyone loses confidence in the process. That's not a technology failure. It's a category failure. No one has built the right infrastructure for allied health imaging hiring specifically — and the vacancy rates reflect it.
That's exactly what RadiologyJobs is built to change.
As the first intelligent career advocacy platform built exclusively for the imaging ecosystem, RadiologyJobs is purpose-built for the roles and candidates that general platforms consistently mishandle. Employers post with full detail — pay ranges, modality requirements, shift structure, active status — so qualified candidates can evaluate fit before applying. Candidates search the way they actually think about roles: by modality, subspecialty, location, and schedule. No ghost jobs. No unrelated healthcare noise. No candidates who don't know what a PACS system is.
The allied health staffing crisis isn't going to be solved by posting more jobs to platforms that weren't built for imaging. It's going to be solved by employers who recognize that a precision-matched, imaging-specific platform is a structurally better answer — and who move early while the market is still catching up.
If your team is carrying unfilled allied health positions and the existing channels aren't delivering, this is the moment to try something built for the problem you're actually solving.
Vacancy rate data sourced from the 2025 ASRT Radiologic Sciences Staffing and Workplace Survey and the 2024 ASRT Radiation Therapy Staffing and Workplace Survey. BLS projections from the Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2024–2034 edition. AMN Healthcare data from the 2022 Survey of Allied Healthcare Professional New Graduate Hiring Patterns. Compensation data from the ASRT 2024 Wage and Salary Survey.